A Change is Gonna Come
I know there are those who may be under the impression that Sam Cooke was a little too pop and too little soul. I would refer these ignorant individuals to Live at the Harlem Square Club. This album I feel even outshines James Brown, Live at the Apollo (though since I've always felt Brown was over rated this doesn't account for too much).
Cooke pinned "A Change is Gonna Come" after personal experiences with Civil rights activists and listening to a Bob Dylan song. The final stanza of Cooke's song is cautiously hopeful reflecting the guarded optimism the times really were changing for the better.
There were times when I thought I couldn't last for long, But now I think I'm able to carry on It's been a long, been a long time coming But I know a change is gonna come, oh yes it will.
There was a time that I thought, Lord this couldn't last very long, somehow I thought I still able, to try to carry on. Its been a long, long, long time coming, but I know a change has gotta come.Its been so long, its been so long, I've lived too long but a change has gotta come,So tired, so tired of standing by myself and standing up alone, but a change has gotta come. You know and I know, that a change is gonna come.
This is a much darker take on Cooke's tune which does not prophesize that a change will come but that it has to. To me this more accurately reflects the outcome of the civil rights movement with its limited objectives and goals. Toward the end Reverend King came to a more overarching vision than that of the original movement. It is ironic that a man whose life was ended due to the fact that he supported an AFSCME strike has led to the likes of Condaleeza Rice and the parody that is the Reverend Al Sharpton.
That is a tragedy. The American Civil Rights movement really was a march for human dignity. It was a march that faltered and at times found its way frustrated by ignorance and hatred. But it did not waver in its commitment to what it knew to be right. Unfortunately that march was never completed. Like so many movements before and since it found that the new world it hoped to birth to be still born. So it settled for diluted reform and the trappings of success.
_______________________________
Otis Blue contained Redding's biggest hit until the post humous release of "Sitting on the Dock of the Bay". While that song has ensured his place in music history it has also helped to obscure what some of us consider to be his true works of art. All three of his covers on this albums (the others being "What a Wonderful World" and "Shake") are excellent. This shows a real growth from a less than stellar "You Send Me" on his earlier "Pain in My Heart" album released early in 1964.
Soul later succumbed to over orchestration as shown by the likes the Marvin Gaye album "What's Going On". There can be no doubt this album attempted to deal with the issues that existed under the waning star of the Civil Rights Movement. Otis Redding's third album demonstrates why that approach was folly. His throaty delivery adds new depth and dimension to classic soul tunes as well as pop standards. Readers are actively encouraged to pick up this album.
2 comments:
I have to admit not having listened Otis Blue through for ... oh, forty years. Now I have, it's a Michelin one-star (worth a visit); but I doubt it will feature as an iPod regular.
For me, the album improves as it goes on. The turning-point, for me at least, is "My Girl" right in the middle. Now, of course, that track is cliché-ed and stale with repetition: I remember it when it was new, fresh and dynamic. Ditto "Wonderful World". "Rock Me Baby" is delicious, laid-back and intense: it had some feed-back on the UK R&B scene. Of course, Redding repays that with "Satisfaction".
Let me stick with "Satisfaction" for a moment. The Stones original was issued only in May 1965, so Redding is giving an "instant reinterpretation"; and (for this listener) it doesn't come off (sorry: that wasn't meant to be a crude pun). I have heard the Stones belt that out time without number, recorded and live, but what makes it work is Jagger's subdued, almost wistful, tone of unfulfilment juxtaposed to that driving beat and the classic riff. The key in the lyric is the repetitition "I can't get no ... no, no, no ...". Jagger is, above all else, intensely theatrical.
Curiously, the Redding approach to "You Don't Miss Your Water" seems more suited to the Stones song.
So, what's wrong for me about Otis Blue? Well, in order of preference:
I'm not a great addict of Soul. It's like taking glasspaper to smooth the rough edges of raw sentiment.
Occasionally, I like a song to have a final chord. Endless fade outs defeat the exercise.
Above all, the soul-shouting and the raucous tenor-saxes of the first three tracks get in the way of interpretation.
Beyond that, I'm not getting into the social/political content here.
Ironically enough it is the first half of the album that I love. I like the fact that soul is essentially barely constrained emotion.
I am, if there was any doubt, definitely a STAX man. Motown is far too polished and over produced for my liking.
Though I don't like James Brown. He whooped and hollared in place of musical talent (IMO). I know that Redding has talent as a singer, but at times is overwhelmed by his emotions. It is also this element that I enjoy in Cooke's live at the Harlem Club. I know Cooke can sing, but to hear him ad lib between songs and go rough when he is moved, I feel elevates the song to a new level.
As for "Satisfaction". Mick Jagger can't get any because of his own narcissism. Yes he is theatrical and is indeed a showman, but it's just that, a show. I hate to say it, but whenever I see him I just hear that damn Carly Simon song in my head.
Maybe where we differ is that you remember when it was new. For me and my generation "Wonderful World" and "Satisfaction" were always old and stale. I hate to say it but I don't like back up vocals for Sam Cooke's original "Wonderful World". I prefer the horns that at least accentuated Redding's voice instead of drown it out.
Post a Comment